Course Schedule:

Below is a week-by-week schedule for the course. Reading assignments are available on the course website, ANGEL or are provided in class. Be sure to note the due dates for each reading as there is a corresponding on-line ANGEL quiz for each reading that is to be completed before class. Print your quiz answers and bring them to the class during which the paper is scheduled to be discussed.

Proposal Assignments and Draft Sections: All proposal assignments are due no later than the start of class time on the date noted in the schedule below. Please bring two hardcopies of each assignment to class. A peer will review one, which you will take with you after class to revise, and the instructors will take the other copy. You will then place a revised copy of the assignment into the appropriate drop-box in ANGEL. Failure to turn in assignments on time will result in no credit for that assignment.

The Schedule below is flexible. We will make changes throughout the semester as we tailor the course to your and our interests. However, due dates will not change.

Week# and Date	Topics		Readings		Helpful Links	Assignment
Week #1 1/11 and 1/13	Introduction - Opening Questionnaire - Introduction & Course Overview Research Plan - What is a research proposal? - Create scientific questions. Scientific Literature* - Finding and retrieving articles - Literature types Faculty Resources at FGCU		Meers, M.B., Demers, N.E. and Savarese, M. (2003/2004). Presenting the Scientific Process: Introducing Philosophy, Theory, Methods and Ethics of Science. Journal of College Science Teaching 33:3:34-39 Available with permission from the publisher Science versus Non-science - Sagan, C.  1996.  The most precious thing.  Chapter 1 in The Demon Haunted World. (*available from the www) - Park, R.  2000.  The Belief Gene: In which science offers a strategy for sorting out the truth.  Chapter 2 in Voodoo Science		- Are there different types of literature? - Retrieving journal articles - Sample proposal questions/titles	- Opening Questionnaire (bring to class on second day) - Faculty Resources at FGCU - see the 'science faculty' button in the header for science fauclty interests-consult the experts to help refine your question- Take the Science attitudes survey on ANGEL Discussion points about Sagan and Parks readings
Week #2 1/18 and 1/20	Science - What is science? - Science vs. non-science Critically Evaluate Scientific Paper – focus on research questions and bibliographies Peer-Review Process Begins - Peer review Bibliography		Evaluating Scientific Papers - Janick-Buckner, D. 1997. Getting undergraduates to critically read and discuss primary literature *avail. on www from the author's webpage Evaluate Scientific Paper		- Retrieving journal articles - Critical Evaluation Guidelines - Leading a Discussion (For Paper Critique Leaders) -Resource guide for Scientific Process - Example proposal questions/titles- this where you want to go!	- Take ANGEL Quizzes by First class of week 2 (Sagan & Park) Submit a piece of primary literature to ANGEL drop box for consideration of in-class critical review
Week #3 1/25 and 1/27	Peer Review Process - Peer Review Annotated Bibliography Critically Evaluate Scientific Paper – outline an introduction	Evaluate Scientific Paper INSTRUCTOR and/or STUDENT CHOICE(S)		- Retrieving journal articles - Critical Evaluation Guidelines - Proposal Description - Sample Introductions - Sample Introduction Outlines		- Bibliography due 1/25
Week #4 2/1 and 2/3	Peer Review Introduction Outline Developing Introduction Critically Evaluate Scientific Paper – focus on Introduction & Methods	Evaluate Scientific Paper INSTRUCTOR and/or STUDENT CHOICE(S)		- Critical Evaluation Guidelines - Proposal Description - Sample Introduction Outlines		IRB representative to class- Dr. Cliff Renk - Annotated Bibliography due 2/1 Introduction Outline due 2/3 bring a copy to class
Week #5 2/8 and 2/10	Peer Review Methods Outline Developing Methodology Critically Evaluate Scientific Paper (Methods, Results & Discussion)	Evaluate Scientific Paper		- Critical Evaluation Guidelines - Proposal Description - Leading a Discussion (For Paper Critique Leaders) Example of Methods		Introduction due 2/8
Week #6 2/15 and 2/17	Peer Review Introduction Research Objectives	Evaluate Scientific Paper		- Critical Evaluation Guidelines - Proposal Description - Leading a Discussion -(For Paper Critique Leaders) - Introduction Peer Review Guidelines
Week #7 2/22 and 2/24	Peer Review Research Objectives, Methods and CV Abstract Table of Contents	Evaluate Scientific Paper INSTRUCTOR and/or STUDENT CHOICE(S)		- Proposal Description Peer Review of Methods - Sample CV CV Template - Research Objective & CV Peer Review Guidelines.		Methods due 2/24 BRING A COPY TO CLASS
Week #8 3/1 and 3/3	Statistics Data Analysis Broader Implications of Research	Evaluate Scientific Paper INSTRUCTOR and/or STUDENT CHOICE(S)		- Intro Peer Review Guidelines - Research Obj., Method & CV Peer Review - Data Analysis PowerPoint Proposal checklist Data Analysis worksheet Statistics Flow chart - Cover sheet (include this coversheet as the first page of your submission) -peer review first submission		IACUC Presentation in class 3/1
3/8 and 3/11	SPRING BREAK NO CLASSES SPRING BREAK NO CLASSES SPRING BREAK NO CLASSES SPRING BREAK NO CLASSES
Week #9 3/15 and 3/17	Peer Review (Editing) Types of Science - Types of Science - Falsification vs Historical Science - Basic and Applied Science - Broader Implications	Types of Science - Cleland, C. E.  2001.  Historical science, experimental science and the scientific method. *avail. on www - Chalmers, A. F.  1982.  Ch. 4: Introducing Falsificationism.		Experimental design/data analysis powerpoint Experimental design/data analysis handout		-- 1st full Submission for peer review—-BRING copy to class Peer-Review 1st Submission print off the Research Obj., Method & CV Peer Review for class on day of peer review - On-Line Angel Quizzes    (Cleland & Chalmers)
Week #10 3/22 and 3/24	Scientific Presentation	Theories as structures: Kuhn's Paradigms		Bring typed answers to the following to class: What does Kuhn mean by a scientific revolution? (1 paragraph) Does science progress?  What do you think? (1 paragraph)
Week #11 3/29 and 3/31	Funding panel review and assignment Funding Panel begins	- Funding Panel
3/25		Last Day to Drop Classes---
Week #12 4/5 and 4/7	Scientific Assumptions Scientific Ethics	Scientific Ethics - Fuchs and Macrina 2005.  Ethics and the Scientist déjà vu plagiarism paper - Couzin-Frankel & Grom 2009. Plagiarism Sleuths		Poster Do's and Don'ts - Complete Proposal Description		- On-Line Angel Quizzes (Fuchs)
Week #13 4/12 and 4/14	Student Evaluations review Final exam review			- Presentation Guidelines Poster Blank Saving to the student share Guidelines for successful posters (powerpoint)		pwerpoint due to share drive no later than 8 AM April 18
Week #14 4/19 and 4/21	Student presentation	(10% of your overall grade!)		- Complete Proposal Description Proposal Poster grading form		2nd Submission due in class on April 21st
FINALS WEEK Week #15 4/26	1:30-4:15 FINAL EXAM	(15% of your overall grade!)		Final Exam potential questions Final Submission guidelines		-- FINAL EXAM Tuesday 1:30-4:15 AB7 116

Readings must be completed by the beginning of class. Assignments are due at the beginning of class.

© Meers, Savarese, Demers, Barreto, Kakareka, Volety, Everham, Cruz-Alvarez, Loh, Goebel, Fugate, Bovard, Hartley, Mujtaba, Gunnels & Green 2010.

This is an official FGCU web page. Florida Gulf Coast University is an equal opportunity/affirmative action institution.

For changes, dead-links, or mistakes, contact: ndemers@fgcu.edu

Dr Demers HOME

© Demers &  Meers (2006). All rights reserved.
Do not reproduce without permission.

Last updated February 16, 2011