On-line Activities
The Research Article
Youth Violence and the Urban
School Response
Abstract
To examine how urban schools have responded
to the threat of youth violence, we interviewed 64 school administrators--in
most cases, principals-- from high, middle, and elementary schools in the
five largest urban areas of Massachusetts. Consistent with other research,
we found that the urban schools in our sample offer numerous programs and
activities aimed at preventing or resolving violent student behavior, aside from repressive law enforcement controls. Most such measures are located
primarily at the high school level; few in the elementary schools. Similarly,
after-school activities are offered by most of the high and middle schools,
but are almost completely lacking in the elementary schools. Moreover,
where they exist, such after-school programs are usually available to students
on a selective basis. These differences between elementary versus middle
and high schools are explained in terms of the perspectives of school administrators
regarding their students: at the elementary school level, students are
regarded as victims of violent media exposure and family conflict; by the
time they reach the middle and high schools, however, student are more
likely viewed as the perpetrators of violence.
Levin, J., & Johnson, H.B. (1997).Youth
violence and the urban school response. Journal of Research in Education,
7, 3-7. |
|
Using the abstract and title provided
above; identify the participant(s), variable(s) under study, potential
extraneous variable(s), research question, research hypothesis, and null
hypothesis.
Using the same groups from Module
1, each group should discuss the title and abstract provided above and
answer the following:
a. What are the variables or constructs
of interest?
b. Create a reasonable research question
c. Identify this research question as
descriptive, normative, correlative, or impact. Justify your choice.
d. Create a reasonable research hypothesis
e. Identify this research hypothesis
as inductive or deductive. Justify your choice.
f. Create a reasonable null hypothesis
g. Identify extraneous variables that
may be present (try to limit these to 3)
E-mail
your group work to Dr. Hewitt-Gervais
See course syllabus for date assignment is due.
Generating Research Questions
1. Based on class discussions, personal
experience, prior knowledge, and the text, identify a research question of
interest to you and your group.
NOTE:
This will form the basis for the research proposal. It may be revised as
the class progresses.
2. Using the same groups from Module
1, each group should discuss their areas of interest and generate a research
question on which to base their proposal.
NOTE:
Please be advised that you will work within this same group until the end
of the semester unless you have concerns about its composition and would
like to switch. If you have concerns, please talk to Dr. Hewitt-Gervais
before the third week of the semester.. Dr. Hewitt-Gervais will assume that
these groups are okay if she does not hear from you on or before that date.
E-mail
your group work to Dr. Hewitt-Gervais
See course syllabus for date assignment is due.
Exercise 1
A teacher has observed a high degree
of anxiety that is aroused by classroom tests and believes that this has
an adverse effect on students' performance. Furthermore, the teacher has
noted that when students are given an opportunity to write comments about
objective questions, their test performance seems to improve. The teacher
reasons that this freedom to make comments must somehow
serve to reduce anxiety and, as a result, the students make better scores.
Based on this scenario:
1. Identify the variables/construct
of interest
2. Create a reasonable research question
3. Identify your research question
as descriptive, normative, correlative, or impact.
4. Create a reasonable research hypothesis
5. Identify your research hypothesis
as inductive or deductive
6. Create a reasonable null hypothesis
7. Identify extraneous variables that
may be present
Submit your group work on the
under the heading, "Module 2 Exercise 1", See course syllabus for date
assignment is due.
Exercise 2
Cognitive Theory applied to the notion
of reading comprehension. Interactive nature of reading and the constructive
nature of comprehension. Readers use their existing knowledge and integrate
this with new knowledge to actively construct meaning from the text. In
addition, good readers possess a set of strategies that they use to make
sense of text and to foster and maintain their
understanding. One of the important strategies used in reading is the drawing
of inferences to fill in details omitted in the text.
Based on this scenario:
1. Identify the variables/construct
of interest
2. Create a reasonable research question
3. Identify your research question
as descriptive, normative, correlative, or impact
4. Create a reasonable research hypothesis
5. Identify your research hypothesis
as inductive or deductive
6. Create a reasonable null hypothesis
7. Identify extraneous variables that
may be present
Submit your group work on the
under the heading, "Module 2 Exercise 2", See course syllabus for date
assignment is due.
Exercise 3
Piaget's theory on the development
of logical thinking in children. Piaget has suggested that children pass
through various stages in their mental development, one of which is the
stage of concrete operations, which begins at age 7 or 8 and marks the
transition from dependence on perception to an ability to use symbolic
reasoning.
Based on this scenario:
1. Identify the variables/construct
of interest
2. Create a reasonable research question
3. Identify your research question
as descriptive, normative, correlative, or impact.
4. Create a reasonable research hypothesis
5. Identify your research hypothesis
as inductive or deductive
6. Create a reasonable null hypothesis
7. Identify extraneous variables that
may be present
Submit your group work on the
under the heading, "Module 2 Exercise 3", See course syllabus for date
assignment is due.
Special Assignment for Group 9 Only
|