On-line
Activities
Readings
Read Chapter Two (Selecting and Defining a Research Topic) and Chapter
Three (Preparing and Evaluating a Research Plan)
The Research Article
Youth
Violence and the Urban School Response
Abstract
To
examine how urban schools have responded to the threat
of youth violence, we interviewed 64 school administrators--in
most cases, principals-- from high, middle, and elementary
schools in the five largest urban areas of Massachusetts.
Consistent with other research, we found that the urban
schools in our sample offer numerous programs and activities
aimed at preventing or resolving violent student behavior,
aside from repressive law enforcement controls. Most
such measures are located primarily at the high school
level; few in the elementary schools. Similarly, after-school
activities are offered by most of the high and middle
schools, but are almost completely lacking in the elementary
schools. Moreover, where they exist, such after-school
programs are usually available to students on a selective
basis. These differences between elementary versus middle
and high schools are explained in terms of the perspectives
of school administrators regarding their students: at
the elementary school level, students are regarded as
victims of violent media exposure and family conflict;
by the time they reach the middle and high schools,
however, student are more likely viewed as the perpetrators
of violence.
Levin,
J., & Johnson, H.B. (1997).Youth violence and the
urban school response. Journal of Research in Education,
7, 3-7.
|
|
Using the abstract
and title provided above, and in the same
groups as in Module 1, each group should discuss and answer the following:
a. What are the
variables or constructs of interest?
b. What might
be a
reasonable research question, given the abstract above?
c. Does
answering this research question require a qualitative or quantitative
approach? Also identify the likely research type (survey
[descriptive], correlational, causal-comparative, experimental,
action research, historical, ethnographic, or grounded theory). Justify your choice.
d. What might
be a reasonable research hypothesis?
e. Identify
your research hypothesis as inductive or deductive. Justify.
f. What might
be a reasonable null hypothesis? g. Identify
extraneous variables that may be present (limit to
3).
Email your group work to Dr.
McConney or to
Dr. Abalos See course syllabus for date assignment is due.
Generating Research Questions
1. Based on personal
experience, prior knowledge, and the text, identify a research question
of interest to you and your group.
NOTE:
This will form the basis for the research proposal. It may be revised
as the class progresses.
2. Using the same
groups as in Module 1, each group should discuss their areas of interest
and generate a research question on which to base their proposal.
NOTE:
Please be advised that you will work within this same group until
the end of the semester unless you have concerns about its composition
and would like to switch. If you have concerns, please talk to Dr.
McConney before the third week of the semester. Dr. McConney will
assume that these groups are okay if he does not hear from you on
or before that date.
Note: The following three
"exercises" are optional. They are provided for your
practice in classifying research, and in identifying variables and
hypotheses.
Exercise 1
A teacher has observed
a high degree of anxiety that is aroused by classroom tests and believes
that this has an adverse effect on students' performance. Furthermore,
the teacher has noted that when students are given an opportunity to
write comments about objective questions, their test performance seems
to improve. The teacher reasons that this freedom to make comments must
somehow serve to
reduce anxiety and, as a result, the students make better scores.
Based on this scenario:
1. Identify the variables/construct of interest
2. Create a reasonable research question
3. Identify
this research question as taking a qualitative or quantitative
approach. Also identify the likely research type (survey
[descriptive], correlational, causal-comparative, experimental, action
research, historical, ethnographic, or grounded theory)
4. Create a reasonable research hypothesis
5. Identify your research hypothesis as inductive or deductive
6. Create a reasonable null hypothesis
7. Identify extraneous variables that may be present
Exercise 2 Cognitive
Theory applied to the notion of reading comprehension. Interactive nature
of reading and the constructive nature of comprehension. Readers use
their existing knowledge and integrate this with new knowledge to actively
construct meaning from the text. In addition, good readers possess a
set of strategies that they use to make sense of text and to foster
and maintain their
understanding. One of the important strategies used in reading is the
drawing of inferences to fill in details omitted in the text.
Based on this scenario:
1. Identify the variables/construct of interest
2. Create a reasonable research question
3. Identify
this research question as taking a qualitative or quantitative
approach. Also identify the likely research type (survey
[descriptive], correlational, causal-comparative, experimental, action
research, historical, ethnographic, or grounded theory)
4. Create a reasonable research hypothesis
5. Identify your research hypothesis as inductive or deductive
6. Create a reasonable null hypothesis
7. Identify extraneous variables that may be present
Exercise 3
Piaget's theory on
the development of logical thinking in children. Piaget has suggested
that children pass through various stages in their mental development,
one of which is the stage of concrete operations, which begins at age
7 or 8 and marks the transition from dependence on perception to an
ability to use symbolic reasoning.
Based on this scenario:
1. Identify the variables/construct of interest
2. Create a reasonable research question
3. Identify
this research question as taking a qualitative or quantitative
approach. Also identify the likely research type (survey
[descriptive], correlational, causal-comparative, experimental, action
research, historical, ethnographic, or grounded theory)
4. Create a reasonable research hypothesis
5. Identify your research hypothesis as inductive or deductive
6. Create a reasonable null hypothesis
7. Identify extraneous variables that may be present
Special Assignment for
Group 2 ONLY
Outline Chapter 4 (Selecting a Sample)
Post outline to appropriate conference on WebBoard
Please
note: this WebBoard link is for Dr. McConney's section only.
Dr.
Abalos' students please open another window in your browser, and log
on to http://onyx.fgcu.edu/~134
|