data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/774e9/774e9679931181f2a707df1d8719edf081fb86dd" alt=""
Welcome to EDF 6215 Home Page
Learning Principles, Summer 1999
Mike Tyler, Ph.D., Instructor
Meeting Times
This class is an Internet-based class. No on-campus meeting
times are planned.
Learning Objectives
"I am not inviting you to follow
me, but to follow yourself. I
am only here to help you if you need me." (Groddeck,
1977, p. 2).
One objective of this course is to demonstrate the importance
of the preceding statement as a basis for relevant
education. I cannot pour knowledge into the minds of students any more
than you can. What you learn and how you grow during this course
will depend entirely upon what you contribute to your own education.
On a more direct level, objectives of this course include
offering students an opportunity to --
-
think about current understandings of the human learning
process in a supportive and facilitative environment
-
explore alternative understandings of "learning" in a classroom
setting, and
-
to critically consider their own approach to teaching.
Additionally, students will be able to --
-
compare major theories of learning.
-
describe the major functions of learning theory.
-
list and describe the historical roots of current learning
theory.
-
compare and contrast behavioral, cognitive, and developmental
approaches to learning.
-
analyze and synthesize the major theories of learning.
-
evaluate several theories of learning relative to their applicability
for achieving educational objectives in the student's professional environment.
-
list and describe components of instructional design suggested
by each of several learning theories.
Grade Policy
Academic achievement in this graduate course is based
on the following grading system:
-
A - Superior Performance
-
B - Average Performance
-
C - Below Average Performance
-
D or F - Failure
-
I - Incomplete
-
Superior: adj. 1: situated
higher up; also 2: better than most others of its kind.
-
Average: adj. 1: equaling
or approximating an average 2: being about midway between extremes 3: being
not out of the ordinary.
(Source: The Merriam Webster Dictionary, p. 686)
Overview of the Assignments
Key Assignments
Policy on the Assignment's Point System
Lesson Plans: All Lesson Plans and the corresponding
Critique of Lesson Plans will receive between 1 and 10 points. Points will
be assigned as follows:
10
|
An exemplary assignment, worthy
of recognition as a model |
9
|
A well completed assignment, demonstrates
mastery of material |
8
|
Adequate completion, suggests
some minor confusion or misunderstanding of significant
material |
7
|
Inadequate completion, more than
minor confusion is present |
6
or fewer
|
Little of no demonstration of
understanding of main points, or severe misunderstanding
of critical areas |
Lesson Plans. Each student
will be responsible for the development of 3 assigned lesson plans.
These lesson plans will generally follow a prescribed format, and are intended
to provide an opportunity to place readings into practice. Lesson
plans must be submitted to the instructor and to the student's partner
no later than 5pm on the date assigned. Assignments not received will be
docked 1 letter grade for each 24 hour period, or portion thereof that
the assignment is late. There will be no exceptions to this rule.
Assignments which are not completed on time create a serious burden on
other students in the class. If you are concerned about technology failures,
dogs that eat papers, or illnesses that interpret your study time, then
plan to turn your assignments in several days in advance. Then, in
the even of unforseen circumstances, you can still be on time!
Lesson Plan Critiques. Each student will
be responsible for the critique of 3 assigned lesson plans. These
critiques will generally follow a prescribed format, and are intended to
provide an opportunity to critically evaluate attempts to move theory into
practice. Each student will critiue a peer's lesson plan while that
peer is critiquing your lesson plan. Balance is called for.
As educators, we need to learn to provide effective, productive feedback
that helps an individual learn. Critiques that provide no information
useful to the author may be deemed inadequate. In addition, such
critiques likely will not demonstrate that the author of the critique understands
the learning theory upon which the lesson plan is based. In these
cases, the critique likely will not be assessed a strong grade because
it fails to communicate the two criteria I will look for: 1) that the critique
author understands the theory, and 2) the critique author has provided
the lesson plan author with helpful feedback.
Discussion Questions. For each of the 4 readings
on a specific discipline, I will post a question or issue to consider.
Each student in the class must then post 2 responses. The first response
may be either a direct answer to the question I posed, or a response to
another student's post. The second post each student makes MUST BE a response
to someone else's post. While every student is required to post at least
twice, no one is limited to 2 responses- and at the discretion of the instructor,
extra credit may be assigned for additional postings which help to significantly
facilitate discussion. Some students in previous offerings of this course
clearly were disappointed in the lack of interaction among students. By
contributing to an on-line discussion you can ensure that interaction remains
at a reasonable level and increase your own learning. Nothing promotes
learning a concept like explaining or teaching it!
PLEASE NOTE- The on-line discussion area is largely intended
as a space for student-to-student interaction. Feel free to post questions
that other students may respond to. If you are seeking information from
the instructor, e-mail the instructor directly. I read my e-mail at least
daily, and will not necessarily read the bulletin board daily. If you post
a question on the WebBoard, I will assume that is an indication you are
seeking input from someone other than me, and I will not respond.
I may however, choose to offer students extra credit for their responses
which meet the needs of others!
Research Paper. Every student is expected to complete
a research paper and present their paper via the web. This paper is conceptualized
as a "review of literature" paper, and will be completed in several steps
as detailed below. A score not to exceed 50 points will be assigned for
this paper.
A complete description can be found here.
Possible Total Points
30
points possible for Lesson Plans
20
points possible for discussion questions (4 x
5 )
30
points possible for Lesson Plan Critiques
50
points possible for research paper
130
total points available
|
117 - 130 = A
104 - 117 = B
91 - 103 = C
90 or below = F |
Sample Assignments
From this page you can access actual
student work that received a very strong grade. These samples are provided
as examples of one manner in which the assignments can be completed, and
should be seen as exemplars, not as templates.
Policy on Late Assignments
My commitment to the class is to hold class during scheduled
hours (whatever that means in cyberspace), to be available during office
hours, to maintain appointments, and to review and return all work in a
timely fashion. For me to maintain my commitments, I must have the opportunity
to schedule assignments at appropriate intervals. Late assignments are
an inconvenience and impinge upon my ability to meet my obligations to
other students and my family. In addition, late assignments keep
other students from completing their work, since much of the class is based
on responding to someone else's work. Therefore, I discourage turning
in assignments after the assigned time. To enforce this, all assignments
are due at 5pm on the date assigned (be on time!).
Late assignments will be assessed a penalty equal to 10% of the possible
points for each week (or portion thereof) that the assignment is late.
Please plan your time accordingly.
Overview of Course Sessions
& Modules
WEEK 1 --
-
Read the Orientation to the course
materials
-
Read the Technology
Orientation materials
-
Topic: Classical Conditioning, Readings: Chapter 2 in Gredler,
M.E. (1997). Learning and instruction: Theory into practice (3rd). Upper
Saddle River, N.J.: Merrill.
E-mail
the instructor acknowledging completion of the readings and asking any
questions that may exist.
WEEK 2 -- All Assignments to be completed by 9-4 at
5pm
MODULE 1 (Internet-based)
-
Topic: Operant Conditioning, Readings: Chapter 5 in Gredler,
M.E. (1997). Learning and instruction: Theory into practice (3rd). Upper
Saddle River, N.J.: Merrill.
-
-
Knowledge
-
Readings: Alexander, P.A., Schallert, D.L., & Hare, V.C.
(1991). Coming to terms:
How researchers in learning and literacy talk about knowledge. Review
of Educational Research, 61, 315-343
List
of potential research topics sent to instructor (see Research
Paper Guidelines).
WEEK 3 -- All Assignments to be completed by 9-11
at 5pm
MODULE 2 (Internet-based)
-
Topic: Bandura's Social Cognitive Theory, Readings:
Chapter 11 in Gredler, M.E. (1997). Learning and instruction: Theory into
practice (3rd). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Merrill.
WEEK 4 -- All Assignments to be completed by 9-18
at 5pm
MODULE 3 (Internet-based)
-
Topic: Gestalt Psychology, Readings: Chapter 3 in Gredler,
M.E. (1997). Learning and instruction: Theory into practice (3rd). Upper
Saddle River, N.J.: Merrill.
WEEK 5 -- All Assignments to be completed by 9-25
at 5pm
MODULE 4 (Internet-based)
-
Topic: Information Processing Theories, Readings: Chapter
7 & 8 in Gredler, M.E. (1997). Learning and instruction: Theory into
practice (3rd). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Merrill.
WEEK 6 -- All Assignments to be completed by 10-02
at 5pm
MODULE 5 (Internet-based)
-
Gagne's Conditions of Learning, Readings: Chapter 6 in Gredler,
M.E. (1997). Learning and instruction: Theory into practice (3rd). Upper
Saddle River, N.J.: Merrill.
WEEK 7 -- All Assignments to be completed by 10-09
at 5pm
To Be Determined
WEEK 8 -- All Assignments to be completed by 10-16
at 5pm
MODULE 6 (Internet-based)
-
Piaget's Cognitive Development Theory
-
Readings: Chapter 9 in Gredler, M.E. (1997). Learning and
instruction: Theory into practice (3rd). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Merrill.
WEEK 9 -- All Assignments to be completed by 10-23
at 5pm
MODULE 7 (Internet-based)
-
Vygotsky's Socio-historical Theory, Readings:
Chapter 10 in Gredler, M.E. (1997). Learning and instruction: Theory into
practice (3rd). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Merrill.
WEEK 10 -- All Assignments to be completed by 10-30
at 5pm
MODULE 8 (Internet-based)
-
Topic: Constructivism, Readings:
WEEK 11 -- All Assignments to be completed by 11-06
at 5pm
MODULE 9 (Internet-based)
-
Topic: Wiener's Attribution Theory, Readings: Chapter 12
in Gredler, M.E. (1997). Learning and instruction: Theory into practice
(3rd). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Merrill.
WEEK 12 -- All Assignments to be completed by 11-13
at 5pm
Research
Paper and supporting presentation files must be complete and received by
the instructor
Complete
Module 10 Homework
If
you are an enrolled student of this course, please click on the blue ball
icon to access the 11 web-based modules.
Resources
Communication
E-mail
the instructor
Connect
to the class bulletin board
Connect
to the class mail list
Go to Top / FGCU
Home Page / Faculty Home
Page
This web page was initially
developed as a result of a collaboration between Mike Tyler (instructor)
and Danilo M. Baylen (instructional designer). Currently, it is maintained
by Mike Tyler, and any questions about
this site should be directed to him.