Module Four
Assessments
 
 Home
Site Map
 Modules
Module 4 Activities
  WebBoard
Resources
 
Module 4 Notes

 

 
    Planning Classroom Test and Assessments  
     
      Remember: The main goal of assessment is to obtain valid, reliable, and useful information concerning student achievement. 

      Steps in developing the assessment instrument:  
     

      1. Specify the achievement domain --  parameters 
      2. Determine what is to be measured --  instructional goals 
      3. Define it precisely so that tasks that evoke the desired performance can be constructed behavioral goals 
       
      Goal of Classroom Assessment = Improved learning and instruction 
     

    Basic Steps in Classroom Assessment 
     
      1. Determining the purpose of the assessment (pre-test, formative, or summative) 
      2. Developing the test specifications (this is the table you are creating) 
      3. Selecting the appropriate assessment tasks (form and type) 
      4. Prepare the relevant assessment tasks  
      5. Assemble the assessment  
      6. Provide instruction 
      7. Evaluate the assessment  
      8. Use the assessment results 

       
      1. Determining the purpose of the assessment  
       
          Pre-testing 
         
          1) Whether students have the prerequisite skills needed for the instruction 

          2) To what extent students have already achieved the objectives of the planned instruction -- are confined to a limited domain - low level of difficulty - serve as a basis for remedial work or for adaptation of instructional plans - not usually different from post test (an equivalent form) 

       
          During instruction assessment 
         
          This is  called diagnostic or formative assessment; done about midway through a unit or chapter 
         
          1) To monitor learning progress  

          2) Provide feedback to students and teachers  

          3) Detect learning errors, diagnostic - practice tests, quizzes - predefined segment of instruction - limited sample of learning outcomes 

         

          End of instruction assessment 
         

          This is called summative assessment and measures the extent to which the intended learning outcomes have been achieved; can serve the same purposes as pre-testing (for the following unit) and formative assessment 

      2. Developing the specifications for tests and assessments (this is the table you are creating) 
       
          Steps:  
         
          1) Prepare a list of instructional objectives  

          2) Outline course content  

          3) Prepare a two-way table / chart; table is limited to those objectives that are measurable  
           


      3. Selecting the appropriate assessment tasks [two forms: objective and performance]  
       
        First Form = Objective
       
          Objective items -- highly structured; single right answer; limits type of response student can make; scoring is quick, easy, and accurate  

          Supply types 
         

          1) Short answer  
          2) Completion  
         

          Selection types: (1) alternate choice (2) matching (3) multiple choice (4) keyed response (5) interpretive exercise 
         

        Second Form = Performance 

          Performance items -- less structure (problem can be redefined and the answer organized and presented in their own words); scoring is more difficult and less reliable  

          Essay questions:  
         

          1) Extended-response  
          2) Restricted response 
          Active (evaluates process):  
         
          1) Construction of graphs, diagrams, models 
          2) Use of equipment or playing an instrument 
         

          Product: Report, art work, science project 
         

          Remember: Bottom line = select the item type that provides the most direct measure of the intended behavioral objectives 


         
      4. Preparing the relevant assessment tasks; the limited number of items should be representative of the domain  
       
        Learning outcomes at the first 3 levels of Bloom's taxonomy are easier to construct items for, so they usually receive undue emphasis; without the table of specifications, ease of construction becomes the dominant criterion  

        How long should the test be? Long enough to provide an adequate sampling of each behavioral objective; keep in mind also the limitations of the students (how long can they sit, etc.) 

          Eliminating irrelevant barriers to performance:  
         

          1) Make sure that the students have the prerequisite skills  and prior knowledge needed 

          2) Measure intended learning outcome, not the irrelevant skills (reading or writing ability)  

 
     

    NOTE: It is fine to test reading and writing ability. Just be sure that reading and writing ability is what you want to test. If you want to test knowledge of how to differentiate different types of clouds, then maybe reading and writing should be kept to a minimum to ensure that if they know the content they have the opportunity to demonstrate that knowledge. 

 
          3) Ambiguity -- again, making sure that you measure your behavioral objectives and not mind reading 

          4) Bias (gender, race, ethnic) -- items should be as free of bias as possible 
           

          General suggestions for writing test items / tasks:  
         
          1) Use table of specifications 

          2) Write more items than needed  

          3) Write items well in advance of testing date  

          4) Write items so that they call for the performance described in the behavioral objectives  

          5) Task to be performed is clearly specified  

          6) Write item at appropriate reading / writing level (in sub-tests not measuring reading, such as, math, science, and social studies, test makers generally write items two years below grade placement to avoid testing reading ability) 

          7) Item provides no clue to answer  

          8) Answer is agreed upon by experts  

          9) Recheck items when revised for relevance

         

          Valid Assessment will:  
         

          1) Improve student achievement  

          2) Improve instruction  

          3) Improve student-teacher relationships

 
     

    Checklist for Specification Table 
     

      1. Are the specifications in harmony with the purpose? 

      2. Do specifications reflect the nature and limits of the domain? 

      3. Do specifications indicate the types of learning outcomes to be measured? 

      4. Do the specifications indicate the sample of learning outcomes to be measured? 

      5. Is the number and types of items / tasks appropriate? 

      6. Is the distribution of items and tasks adequate? 

      7. Is the number of items adequate to represent the domain? 
       

 
          We have now covered the basic steps in classroom assessment:  
         
          1. Determining the purpose of the assessment (pre-test, formative, or summative) 

          2. Developing the test specifications (this is the table you are creating) 

          3. Selecting the appropriate assessment tasks (form and type) 

          4. Prepare the relevant assessment tasks 

         

      We will cover 5 through 8 later in the term. 
       
        5. Assemble the assessment  

        6. Provide instruction 

        7. Evaluate the assessment  

        8. Use the assessment results


 
 
Readings 
 
      Chapter 5  Planning Classroom Tests and Assessments  -- Linn R.L. & Gronlund, N.E. (1995). Measurement and assessment in teaching. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill. 
     

      Study Guide for Mid-term Exam

 
 
 
 
Home
Site Map
Modules
Module 4 Activities
WebBoard
Resources
 
Updated last January 1999 by CF&MD staff.  
Please direct comments to the website developer.  
Copyright 1999 Hewitt-Gervais & Baylen 
All rights reserved.
 
  
Florida Gulf Coast University  
College of Professional Studies  
School of Education