APPENDIX CX. Results of canonical correlation analysis: categorical variables
Categorical variables: 1936 cover class, topography, and soil. All analyses run at all three spatial scales. (- sample size to small, * not significant at p<0.05)
correlation coefficient eigenvalue variable scale CC1 CC2 CC3 CC1 CC2 CC3
PERCENT COVER (1936): 1 < 20 20 * * * 0.471 0.710 0.827 2 20 - 50 20 * * * 0.412 0.651 0.804 3 50 - 80 20 0.479 0.435 0.403 0.278 0.495 0.676 4 80 - 100 20 0.637 * * 0.549 0.757 0.850 1 < 20 10 0.607 0.565 * 0.380 0.685 0.830 2 20 - 50 10 0.342 * * 0.387 0.727 0.860 3 50 - 80 10 0.304 0.225 * 0.373 0.568 0.734 4 80 - 100 10 0.378 0.278 * 0.497 0.745 0.868 1 < 20 5 0.461 * * 0.278 0.188 0.115 2 20 - 50 5 0.278 0.188 * 0.566 0.816 0.907 3 50 - 80 5 0.290 0.121 * 0.689 0.801 0.893 4 80 - 100 5 0.272 0.225 * 0.486 0.811 0.887
TOPOGRAPHY: 1 Valley 20 * * * 0.399 0.657 0.876 2 Bench 20 0.697 * * 0.433 0.638 0.792 3 Slope 20 0.579 0.400 * 0.506 0.697 0.859 4 Ridge 20 * * * 0.466 0.761 0.924 1 Valley 10 0.414 * * 0.437 0.660 0.791 2 Bench 10 0.455 0.305 * 0.485 0.676 0.816 3 Slope 10 0.509 0.277 0.179 0.669 0.829 0.892 4 Ridge 10 0.670 * * 0.442 0.692 0.842 1 Valley 5 * * * 0.716 0.833 0.897 2 Bench 5 0.446 0.155 0.150 0.782 0.859 0.931 3 Slope 5 0.344 0.230 0.099 0.629 0.890 0.937 4 Ridge 5 0.465 0.342 * 0.486 0.720 0.823
SOIL TYPE: 1 coloso 20 - - - - - - 2 cristal 20 0.567 * * 0.369 0.625 0.770 3 prieto 20 * * * 0.329 0.615 0.630 4 zarzal 20 0.558 0.366 0.342 0.495 0.664 0.809 5 fluvaquent 20 * * * 0.333 0.656 0.875 1 coloso 10 - - - - - - 2 cristal 10 0.379 0.301 * 0.451 0.719 0.844 3 prieto 10 * * * 0.339 0.631 0.843 4 zarzal 10 0.488 0.241 * 0.714 0.855 0.922 5 fluvaquent 10 * * * 0.422 0.753 0.861 1 coloso 5 * * * 0.617 0.816 0.928 2 cristal 5 0.333 0.211 * 0.619 0.849 0.918 3 prieto 5 0.334 * * 0.348 0.570 0.767 4 zarzal 5 0.360 0.189 0.081 0.731 0.914 0.946 5 fluvaquent 5 0.525 * * 0.518 0.753 0.856
Return to the Table of Contents