Module Eight -- Grade Book
 
 Home
Site Map
 Modules
Module 8 Activities
  WebBoard
Resources
 
Module 8 Notes 

 
Marking and Reporting  

Marking and Reporting 

    Functions of Marking and Reporting Systems  
     
      1. Instructional -- evaluating teaching and materials used  
      2. Reporting to Parents / Guardians  
      3. Administrative 
  
    Types of Marking and Reporting Systems  
     
      1. Traditional Letter Grade System (A, B, C, D, F)  
      2. Pass -- Fail System  
      3. Checklists of Objectives -- These are done in some school districts at the elementary level. They present a bar graph to display the level of mastery of specific skills.  
      4. Letters to Parents / Guardians  
      5. Portfolios of Student Work  
      6. Parent-Teacher Conferences 

       
    Guidelines for Developing a Multiple Marking and Reporting System  
     
      1. Should be guided by the functions to be served  
      2. Should be developed cooperatively by parents, students, and school personnel 
 
     

    THINK ABOUT IT!  

         
    Do any school districts incorporate parents' and students' suggestions into their grading systems? 
     
 
      3. Should be based on a clear statement of educational objectives  
      4. Should be based on adequate assessment  
      5. Should be detailed enough to be diagnostic and yet compact enough to be practical  
      6. Should provide for parent-teacher conferences  
       
        Who makes the decision about what an "A" is? 
 

 
    Who makes the decision about what an "A" is?  

    Assigning Letter Grades  
     
    1. Determining what to include in a letter grade  
     
     

      Amount of work vs quality of work  
      Effort  
      Behavior  

      Your grades must communicate clearly to parents, students, and administrators. If you include factors other than achievement toward academic objectives, how will parents, students, and administrators know what a grade of A means? I do include a test question on this issue in the final exam.  
       

        E-mail me if you are unclear about this issue.  
       

          LETTER GRADES ARE ONLY AS VALID AS THE MEASURES OF ACHIEVEMENT ON WHICH THEY ARE BASED  
       
       

    2. Combining data in assigning grades  
     
     
      Grades must be weighted, because most teachers will want to give greater weight to tests than to homework and greater weight to projects than to classwork.  
       
     
      DEFINITIONS  

        Raw score -- the number a student gets right; is not useful by itself  

        Percent -- the raw score divided by the total number of points possible  

        Weighted -- assigning varying amounts that each assignment contributes to the whole and multiplying that weight by the percent earned; 

      Example: 

      If you made a 80% on the mid-term and if the mid-term counted for 45 points out of 100, you multiply .80 by 45 and obtain the number of points you earned for the mid-term (= 36). 

      If you add this to the 10 you can earn for homework, you have 46. To earn an A (at least a 90%), you would need to get 45 out of the 50 questions correct on the final. 45 + 46 = 91!  

        Composite -- when you add all of the assignments together to obtain the final grade for the quarter / semester for an individual student. In the example above, 36 + 10 + 45 = 91, 91 is the composite score.  
       

        These definitions are on the final, if they are not clear, e-mail me about them. 

     

    3. Selecting the proper frame of reference for grading  
     

      A. In relation to other group members; this is norm-referenced  
     
      When you create a normal distribution from scores in most classrooms, you are imposing a structure that does not normally exist. Normal distributions occur when the number in your group is greater than 100 AND when you know you have students who vary greatly in ability. These criteria (large group size and varying abilities) do occur for those who create standardized tests. They are not typical of a classroom --- thankfully. To give you a demonstration here is an example of midterm grades with a normal distribution imposed on them. I am combining classes for a total of 48 students.  
       
        2% of the students get A = 1 student  
        14% of the students get B = 7 students  
        68% of the students get C = 32 students  
        14% of the students get D = 7 students  
        2% of the students get F = 1 student  
     
      Then you rank the scores from highest to lowest and count out 1 A, 7 B's, 32 C's, 7 D's, and 1 F.  
     
     
          98 = A  
          -------------  

          96  all these are B's  
          96  
          94  
          92  
          92  
          91  
          91  
          -----------  

          90 all these are C's  
          90  
          90  
          88  
          88  
          88  
          87  
          87  
          87  
          85  
          85  
          85  
          85  
          83  
          83  
          83  
          83  
          83  
          81  
          81  
          81  
          79  
          79  
          79  
          79  
          77  
          77  
          77  
          77  
          75  
          72  
          72  
          ------------------  

          71 all these are D's  
          71  
          71  
          71  
          69  
          67  
          65  
          -------------------  

          60 = F  
           
           

    It should be evident that this creates competition and leaves the impression of unfairness. After all, if you can answer most of the questions correctly why shouldn't your grade reflect that instead of reflecting your rank in this particular class (group of students). This is frequently a test question on the final exam. 
     
        E-mail me about this in class, if it's not clear.  
     

    B. In relation to specified standards; this is criterion-referenced  

    This is how I grade. If you have mastered 90% or more of the objectives, you earn an A; 80-89% a B, 70-79% a C, 60-69% a D, and 59% or below an F.  
     

    C. In relation to learning ability; no reference point beyond the individual student; do teachers really know a student's learning ability? What other factors influence learning?  
     

    D. In relation to amount of improvement; no reference point beyond the individual student; other factors influence learning other than sheer effort.  
     



 
    Conducting Parent-Teacher Conferences 
     
      1. Make plans for the conference  
      2. Begin the conference in a positive manner  
      3. Present the student's strong points before describing the areas needing improvement  
      4. Encourage parents to participate and share information  
      5. Plan a course of action cooperatively  
      6. End the conference with a positive comment  
      7. Use good human relation skills during the conference  
       
    These really are a matter of common sense. You, as a teacher, need to realize that a parent can be your greatest ally. It is not in your best interest (or the best interest of the student) to alienate any parent.  
     

 
 
Readings 
     
    Chapter 13, Marking and Reporting 

    from Linn R.L. & Gronlund, N.E. (1995). Measurement and assessment in teaching. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill. 

 
Home
Site Map
Modules
Module 8 Activities
WebBoard
Resources
 
Updated last March 1999 by CF&MD staff.  
Please direct comments to the website developer.  
Copyright 1999 Hewitt-Gervais & Baylen. All rights reserved.
 
  
Florida Gulf Coast University  
College of Professional Studies  
School of Education